← Back to Research

Evaluating Ideas: A Framework for Strategic Decision-Making

July 20, 2025

Evaluating Ideas: A Framework for Strategic Decision-Making

Not all ideas deserve equal attention. The ability to distinguish between ideas worth pursuing and those better left unexplored is a critical strategic skill. This framework provides a structured approach to idea evaluation.

The Three-Dimensional Evaluation Model

Effective idea evaluation examines three interdependent dimensions:

Impact Assessment: Measures potential value from customer, business, strategic, and market perspectives.

  • High: Solves significant problems or addresses critical needs
  • Medium: Moderate potential, meaningful contribution
  • Low: Limited reach, marginal benefits, unclear value

Feasibility Analysis: Evaluates realistic implementation potential.

  • High: Executable with current resources and capabilities
  • Medium: Requires additional resources or extended timelines
  • Low: Currently impractical, needs significant capability development

Strategic Alignment: Measures fit with strategic direction, mission, vision, and organizational culture.

  • Strong: Directly supports goals, leverages core competencies
  • Moderate: Partially aligns, may require adjustments
  • Weak: Diverges from strategic direction

The Strategic Classification Matrix

By mapping ideas across these dimensions, classify them into actionable categories:

  • Quick Wins: High impact, high feasibility, strong alignment. Immediate priorities.
  • Strategic Projects: High impact, medium feasibility, strong alignment. Require planning but offer significant value.
  • Moonshots: High impact, low feasibility, strong alignment. Long-term strategic bets.
  • Incremental Improvements: Medium impact, high feasibility, moderate alignment. Valuable but not strategic priorities.
  • Question Marks: Unclear across dimensions. Require further exploration.
  • Pass: Low impact, low feasibility, or weak alignment. Deprioritize or archive.

Context-Dependent Evaluation

Evaluation isn't absolute. Classification depends on current strategic priorities, available resources, market conditions, organizational capabilities, and competitive landscape.

Decision-Making Framework

Handle classified ideas systematically:

  • Pursue Immediately: Quick wins and high-priority strategic projects
  • Plan Strategically: Moonshots and promising question marks
  • Archive Thoughtfully: Ideas that might be valuable under different conditions
  • Discard Clearly: Ideas that don't align with strategic direction

Conclusion

Effective idea evaluation isn't about limiting creativity—it's about channeling it strategically. By systematically assessing impact, feasibility, and alignment, you can make informed decisions about where to invest your time, resources, and energy. This discipline ensures that your best ideas receive the attention they deserve while preventing resource drain from less promising concepts.